EXAMPLE 2
H
---- W
/ \
S D
H DIES – ESTATE = R325 000,00
WIFE → CHILD’S SHARE = R325 000,00
÷ 3 = R108 333,33
OR R250 000,00
→ R75 000,00
SON
→ R37 500,00 } RESIDUE
DAUGHTER → R37 500,00 }
NO SPOUSE, NO DESCENDANT – BUT :
(i) BOTH PARENTS → BOTH PARENTS → ½ EACH
(ii) ONE PARENT →
→ SURVIVING PARENT → ½
→ DESCENDANTS OF DECEASED PARENT → ½
(SIBLINGS)
IF NO DESCENDANTS, THEN DECEASED’S
PARENT’S ½ GOES TO SURVIVING PARENT i.e. SURVIVING PARENT GETS ALL.
EXAMPLE :
M ---- F
/ \
X Y Z
EXAMPLE 1 X DIES → M + F INHERIT ½ EACH
EXAMPLE 2 X DIES but F PREDECEASED
M → ½
F’s ½ → Y + Z
Y → ¼
EXPLANATION OF
SIBLINGS, HALF SIBLINGS, STEP SIBLINGS
VICTOR + ANNA THOMAS +
MARY
/
/ \
LINDA SUE SALLY
ANNA + THOMAS
/ \
CAROL CLAIRE
LINDA = ½ SISTER to CAROL & CLAIRE (SAME
MOTHER)
SUE & SALLY = ½ SISTERS to CAROL
& CLAIRE (SAME FATHER)
LINDA, SUE & SALLY = STEP SISTERS – NO BLOOD
RELATION
•Where the deceased was a spouse in a polygamous
marriage (had
more than one customary wife) and left no descendants: Polygamous marriages are
usually out of community of property.
A………….B
/ | /
C E D
•A
&
B = parents of the deceased; E = the deceased; C and D = customary marriage
spouses of the deceased.
In terms of section 1(1)(a) of Act 81 of
1987, as amended by the Constitutional Court decision in Bhe
and Others v Magistrate Khayelitsha and Others, the
two spouses of the deceased (C and D) will inherit the estate in equal shares,
to the exclusion of any other family members.
Note the following: A
question that needs to be answered is: “Who is a spouse for purposes of
intestate succession?”
a) As
starting point it can be said that any party to a valid marriage in terms of
the Marriage Act, 25 of 1961 (a civil marriage) is regarded as a spouse for
purposes of intestate succession.
Where the deceased was a spouse in
a monogamous marriage (only one spouse), was married out of community of
property, and left no descendants: Amount available for distribution: R400 000
A B
| /
C E C
E = deceased: S = spouse: A = father: B =
mother: C = brother
Solution:
The
surviving spouse is the only intestate heir, irrespective of the value of the
estate. Because the deceased and surviving spouse were married out of community
of property, the surviving spouse will inherit the whole balance for
distribution in the amount of R400 000 in terms of section 1(1)(a) of the
Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987.
OUT OF COMMUNITY WITH AN ACCRUAL SYSTEM
H and W married out of community of
property with an accrual. During the marriage H’s estate showed an accrual of
R200 000- R350 000. while W’s estate showed an accrual of R100 000-R200 000. in
terms of the matrimonial property law W has a claim to half of the difference
of the accrual that is R75 000 against H’s estate.
The
remainder of H’s estate available for distribution therefore amounts to R275
000. in the case of child’s portion W inherits 125 000 and the remainder
divided amongst H’s descendants.
UNWORTHINESS FOR INTESTATE SUCCESSION
Someone could qualify as an
intestate heir but because of certain factors he would still be unable to
benefit. He is therefore considered to be unworthy. E.g. a person who murdered
the deceased.
The Act stated that the person who
is unworthy to inherit from an intestate estate may not be represented, however
this was deleted. S1(7) of the Act now stipulates any benefit that the unworthy
person would have obtained had he not been unworthy, devolves as if he had
died. Therefore an unworthy person may be represented.
RENOUNCEMENT BY INTESTATE HEIR
S1(6) if a descendant of a
deceased, excluding a minor or mentally ill descendant, who together with the
surviving spouse of the deceased, is entitled to a benefit from an intestate
estate renounces his right to receive such benefit, such benefit shall vest in
the surviving spouse.
THE
POSITION OF THE ADOPTED CHILD
Please do make it a point that you read
on this.
Look at the following:-
I.The
common law position.
II.Sec
20 (1) & (2) Child care Act 74 of 1983, compare it with
III.Sec
242 children's Act 38 of 2005
Also look at Sec 17 child care Act… find
all of this and more on Page28-32
THE
POSITION OF THE EXTRA-MARITAL (ILLEGITIMATE) CHILD
I.Common law position.
II.Sec 1(2)
of the Intestate
Succession Act
III.Case law re Moatsi
se Boedel
2002 (4) SA 712
No comments:
Post a Comment